tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8441758389977123332.post7980819213546300995..comments2023-06-17T07:51:21.039-06:00Comments on Critical Communication Re-Imagined: When To "Post" Wolf :0Gideon Burtonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08282494104976426309noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8441758389977123332.post-32818103351927969772016-03-07T09:31:52.981-07:002016-03-07T09:31:52.981-07:00I like your connection between the cases of Cherno...I like your connection between the cases of Chernobyl and Snowden. I think that with a little more development, this will make a compelling argument. If I were not familiar with either Chernobyl or Edward Snowden, I would want more details so that I could understand the relevance of the topics in question. Why didn't the Russian government do anything? What exactly was the NSA doing? Answering questions such as these will help give your topic relevance to the reader.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03418260939720766510noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8441758389977123332.post-76020987998951455872016-03-07T09:13:26.089-07:002016-03-07T09:13:26.089-07:00I don't really get the title. This does frame ...I don't really get the title. This does frame a contemporary issue using history. However, where is the personal angle? Right now the topic is a bit broad. If you personalize it this may help to sharpen the focus. As you draw upon and refer to contemporary authoritative sources, this will give your argument more teeth. <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/daily/2015/06/02/nsa-surveillance-congress-sunset/" rel="nofollow">Here is one such contemporary source.</a>Gideon Burtonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08282494104976426309noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8441758389977123332.post-12426644060257159872016-03-07T08:27:09.355-07:002016-03-07T08:27:09.355-07:00Your use of an older example (Chernobyl) coupled w...Your use of an older example (Chernobyl) coupled with a more recent example (Snowden) helps me as a reader understand the importance of the questions you are raising. As to the answer, I believe many would agree that the decisions or privacy versus transparency should be decided based on the number of people and gravity of effects. In other words, how many are affected if either decision is made, and what are these consequences?Michael Anthony Stevenshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18276500904439778962noreply@blogger.com