The world has
grown more and more complex. Our brains have to find new ways to deal with this
complexity. In the above video, James Flynn explains how IQ scores have
increased dramatically as time goes on.
It's not that humans are now smarter than ever, but it is
because we think in a different way. We see past the concrete into the
hypothetical.
Flynn goes on
to explain the studies of a man named Luria. Luria presented the scenario to
people who just entering the digital age, "'There are no camels in
Germany. Hamburg is a city in Germany. Are there camels in
Hamburg?' And the fellow said, 'Well, if it's large enough, there
ought to be camels there.' And Luria said, 'But what do my words
imply?' And he said, 'Well, maybe it's a small village, and there's
no room for camels.' In other words, he was unwilling to treat
this as anything but a concrete problem, and he was used to camels
being in villages, and he was quite unable to use the
hypothetical, to ask himself what if there were no camels in
Germany."
There's been a
shift in the way we think about things. We now are able to easily accept
hypotheticals. In fact we mostly use hypotheticals to reason because its almost
impossible to really know anything.
Flynn says that
he once said to his racist grandfather, "'How would you feel if tomorrow
morning you woke up black?' they said that is the dumbest thing you've
ever said. Who have you ever known who woke up in the morning that turned
black?"
His old
fashioned grandparents didn't understand that way of thinking. They could only
imagine someone literally turning black in the middle of the night, rather than
considering the way they would feel if they were oppressed.
With technology we begin to see other possibilities than the concrete ones right in front of us. This allows us to think more dynamically and solve problems better. Technology has changed our perspective completely. The way we view the world is so important. It determines our actions.
I like where you're going, Jonah. It's about time someone explains the generational technological divide. I couldn't help but wonder if you could take this even further: maybe you could extrapolate, justifying or even predicting future modes of thinking influenced by technology.
ReplyDelete